brownbomber wrote: ↑
July 12th, 2018, 3:07 am
1st and foremost i would like to remind you ,i asked you to show me any outside source that says the amorites were hamitic..youve failed to do say,so im guessing i won that point..
Now to your ?s
@amazigh....The Maghreb region in northwestern Africa is believed to have been inhabited by Berbers from at least 10,000 BC. Local cave paintings, which have been dated to twelve millennia before present, have been found in the Tassili n'Ajjer region of southern Algeria. Other rock art has been observed in Tadrart Acacus in the Libyan desert. A Neolithic society, marked by domestication and subsistence agriculture, developed in the Saharan and Mediterranean region (the Maghreb) of northern Africa between 6000 and 2000 BC.
The first semitic and hamitic speakers..
From biblical perspective ..i guess that would be shem and ham ..
From a REAL life prospective..the first semitic nation im aware of is akkad..ol sargon and nem..i want to say that was around 3,500 -2,500... The first hamitic nation would be the sudan ,not 100 percent..natufians were an east african ppl and you already posted an article on them that dates them back to 13000 bc (in the levant) i belive they were an extension of the nubian culture ..hamitic language is older than semitic yet the bible has shem being listed as the oldest...
@the amorites being enslaved..the amorites wouldnt have been slaves..the amorites were the parent group of the hyksos and thats who went through" slavery..".
The Lord shall bring thee into Egypt — Which was literally fulfilled under Titus, when multitudes of them were carried thither and sold for slaves. With ships — according to joshephus. General titus i believe vespasian was the emperor already sent the jewsvto egyot etc..yourbresponse is yoibdont believed xyz without providing anybproof or further explaination,im just waiting to see what youll come up with lmao
The Lord shall bring thee into Egypt — Which was literally fulfilled under Titus, when multitudes of them were c
@khazars.. The kharzars are only 1/3 rd semitic..2/3rds of their dna is european.
What are your thoughts on the mizrahi jews,for some odd reason yall only speak about the karzars,the khazars are the least pure ..why not discuss the purest jews the mizrahi?
Mizrahi Jews, Mizrahim (Hebrew: מִזְרָחִים), also referred to as Edot HaMizrach (עֲדוֹת-הַמִּזְרָח; "Communities of the East"; Mizrahi Hebrew: ʿEdot(h) Ha(m)Mizraḥ), Bene HaMizrah ("Sons of the East"), or Oriental Jews, are descendants of local Jewish communities in the Middle East from biblical times into the modern era. They include descendants of Babylonian Jews and Mountain Jews from modern Iraq, Syria, Bahrain, Kuwait, Dagestan, Azerbaijan, Iran, Uzbekistan, the Caucasus, Kurdistan, Afghanistan, India, and Pakistan. Yemenite Jews, as well as North African Jews are sometimes also included, but their histories are separate from Babylonian Jewry.
See how it says theyre (the mizrahi) are descendants of local jewish communities from BIBLICAL TIMES into the modern era..waiting on your response lmao
@amorites and the bible verse you pasted..yea israel made up the story/ stories.it's literally that simple..the fact that the only place you can prove this story is from a book we all kno that have edited and redited,says more than i can say
@ evidence of the amorites being semites..
1..they originated in syria..semitic land..they didnt migrate their ,theyre native to the moutain area of syria
2.they spoke an extinct branch of semitic,it was three branches of western semitic languages ..the. Amorites had their own semitic language ,so who did they get it from themselves...same with the hittites,the hittites are believed to be some of (in not the ) oldest indo european language..they couldntve copied. If theyre the oldest branch..
3..genetics ,theyre haplogroup links them to other semites..
4..interestingly enough the land was known as the land of aram ,and the aramean ppl were a related group
Vs your single piece of evidence, various bible verses.that may or may not have been tampered with
@ irish..the irish did descend from neolithic middle eastern farmers..they would be distant relatives to the ppl of the middle east..the neolithic farmers left the middke east for europe thousands of yrs. Before the events of the bible took place
@ that egyptian pic..yea that could be a e1b1a carrier..the blacks from uganda etc
Our ancestors were already in west africa during this time (well mine were ,ket you tell it you was in the middle east somewhere praying to aliens)
Asselar man is a Neolithic skeleton discovered by Theodore Monod and Wladimir Besnard (in various sources incorrectly named M.M. Besnard or M.V. Besnard) in 1927, in the Adrar des Ifoghas. The massif is located near Essouk in what is now the Kidal Region of Mali. Wickliffe Draper funded the expedition.
The Asselar specimen has been dated to around 6,400 BP, making it no older than the Holocene. Along with such fossils as Iwo Eleru (11,000 BP) and Ishango (8,000 BP), which were excavated from archaeological sites in West and Central Africa, Asselar is one of the earliest known anatomically modern human skeletons of Negroid type. Older fossils with a similar morphology have also been found near Khartoum, dated to between 8,000 and 5,000 BC.