South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

HoodBeenUp
superior
Posts: 5464
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 12:53 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by HoodBeenUp » March 20th, 2013, 2:14 am

South Central has 800,000 people :facepalm:

And no its not worse then Chicago. This thread has been done time and time again.

You had over 1,000 murders twice and one year was because of the riots which 50-60 extra people died.
At the time LA population was near 4 million

Chicago had 2.8 million and had 980 murders those years.

New York had 7.7 million people and had 2,000 murders.

Those 2 cities only had more murders in total numbers because of population.

Add you had 1 million more people in population, but barely many murders then Chicago.

Detriot has what 700,000 people and 400 murders....more west coast hype by the media.

Compton is not even that bad 20 murders for 90,000 people?

Englewood Chicago had 25-30 murders a year with a population of 35,000 people

Camden has 60 murders for 80,000 people.


HYPE!!!!

HoodBeenUp
superior
Posts: 5464
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 12:53 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by HoodBeenUp » March 20th, 2013, 2:15 am

Los Angeles was given the title, gang capital of the US back in 1988 by Tom Brokaw on a gang documentary. I am not sure if another person preceded Mr. Brokaw with this title, but since then it as stuck, but is that title appropriate for Los Angeles?

Los Angeles, California represents the “biggest” in nearly everything, being the largest city in the most populated State, LA is the capital for everything, including pollution, cars, traffic, guns, illegal immigration, population, etc. So saying that Los Angeles is the gang capital of the US is only true because of the actual numbers, but on a per capita examination, the City of Chicago has more murders and has consistently had more murders related to gangs since 1992, more so than Los Angeles and New York.

The lie I heard was by 790 KABC host Kevin James that Los Angeles is the “gang capital of the world” which is completely untrue. There are so many countries that are plagued with more violent gang activity throughout the world such as Jamaica, South Africa, El Salvador, and Brazil to name a few. Of course he cites absolutely no person or offers no statistics on that claim, but many of his listeners most likely believe this false statement. Although I have used the phrase, “gang capital of the country,” I say this with 100% certainty that Los Angeles is not the “gang capital of the world” and anyone who says so is either ignorant or spewing propaganda.

locside
soldier
Posts: 230
Joined: March 14th, 2013, 1:06 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by locside » March 20th, 2013, 3:07 am

HoodBeenUp wrote:South Central has 800,000 people :facepalm:

And no its not worse then Chicago. This thread has been done time and time again.

You had over 1,000 murders twice and one year was because of the riots which 50-60 extra people died.
At the time LA population was near 4 million

Chicago had 2.8 million and had 980 murders those years.

New York had 7.7 million people and had 2,000 murders.

Those 2 cities only had more murders in total numbers because of population.

Add you had 1 million more people in population, but barely many murders then Chicago.

Detriot has what 700,000 people and 400 murders....more west coast hype by the media.

Compton is not even that bad 20 murders for 90,000 people?

Englewood Chicago had 25-30 murders a year with a population of 35,000 people

Camden has 60 murders for 80,000 people.


HYPE!!!!
I DONT CARE ABOUT STATISTICS FROM THE 2000S FOO!!!!!!! n*gga CRIME IN EVERY CITY IS DOWN THESE DAYS AINT NOTHIN CLOSE TO THE OLD DAYS ALL I CARE ABOUT IS THE 80S AND 90S WHEN SOUTH CENTRAL LOS ANGELES MADE CHICAGO AND EVERY OTHER CITY IN AMERICA LOOK LIKE b*tch CITY,PHUK 2013 n*gga YALL AINT BREAKIN RECORDS RIGHT NOW YALL JUST THE HIGHEST OF THE DROP CRIME ERA.COMPTON USED TO CLOCK IN 90 HOMICIDES A YEAR IN THE 80S AND 90S AND IT WAS MURDER CAPITAL OF AMERICA OVER 10 TIMES.LOS ANGELES HAD 2,900,000 PEOPLE IN THOSE TIMES STOP DOWN PLAYIN IT,U JUST WANT CHICAGO TO BE THE HARDEST,ITS ONLY THE HARDEST IN THIS TIME WERE IN NOW AND 2013 AINT sh*t LIL n*gga.

MurdaWoodz438
underboss
Posts: 1194
Joined: September 21st, 2012, 12:29 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by MurdaWoodz438 » March 20th, 2013, 4:19 am

@loside How did LA make Chicago "look" weak in the 90's? Every major city and even a few mid-size cities were all crime ridden in the 90's. While LA recorded over 1000 murders, Chicago, which is smaller in population recorded over 900 so again, how does that make Chicago look "weak"? LA is much more populated than Chicago present day and has 200 less murders and that's the reason why people see LA as soft compared to the CHI. Chicago has always been harder then LA but now its obviously much worse. When you realize that and accept it, trust me, you will sleep much better at night!

HoodBeenUp
superior
Posts: 5464
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 12:53 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by HoodBeenUp » March 20th, 2013, 5:21 am

They understand they just can't accept it. They are truly sick in the head....they want to be known as the gang capitol because some newscaster called them that. Honestly there is no "gang capitol"

But if you want to go by what city has more violence, which is something not even worth bragging about anyway. Chicago, Detriot, Philly, New Orleans, Houston, Miami all had more violent crimes then LA :shrug:

koz park
associate
Posts: 120
Joined: February 20th, 2013, 8:58 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by koz park » March 20th, 2013, 10:23 am

Awwww man this sh*t soooo stupid. Chi and l.a. are so different that there is no fair way to compare em. In some ways l.a. is more dangerous and in some waye chi is more dangerous. n*ggas on this site need to sto being jealous of other cities. Chi n*ggas mad cuz l.a. the gang capital and l.a. n*ggas mad cuz chi murder rate higher. sh*t stupid as f*ck.

goonitary
associate
Posts: 113
Joined: February 27th, 2013, 12:03 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by goonitary » March 20th, 2013, 10:23 am

I aint read all the post, just a few yesterday, but..

20 years ago chicago did not have more people den l.a.

Chicago was in the cut F*ck*n sh*t up, and l.a. was wild as sh*t. L.a. really did signify this gangbangin sh*t 20 years ago.

Thread starter aint got links, so he more than likely talkin out his neck.

L.a. only had about 60-70 more murders than chicago when chocago was puttin up over 900 and l.a. was puttin over 1,000.... nyc was shittin on both cities with 1,000+ murders for a couple years (meaning 1,000+ murders more than each city)

The difference now is bigger city gangs let police slow them down while chicago didnt.

20 years, you had to have permission to do a murder in chicago unless you got caught lackin and yo back was against the wall, im assumin l.a. wasnt really like that. Which is why sh*t seemed more hectic over there than here.

Another reason why chicago still the way it is (i dont buy into all that "we not organized no more" bullshit) is because the city is as corrupt, and f*cked up than it was in al capone days. Police force aint sh*t but a larger Detroit police force. Governors be pocketing millions. Mayors only be worried about parking prices and red light cameras, and dont hire police(which um cool wit lol). Yall dont see a coincidence in Daley leaving after that barack obama senator seat scandal, then rahm becoming mayor, barack obamas friend? Chicago on average has more police retire than police hired. Yea we got more police per capita, but imagine if we had 50,000 police officers, like nyc, rather than our like 12,000 police? Lol. sh*t a be drastically slowed down


Finally, chicago n*ggas. If you gone keep callin chicago GANGS mobs, then stop arguing over gang capitols..

Realife
fresh meat
Posts: 23
Joined: October 14th, 2012, 11:51 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by Realife » March 20th, 2013, 10:46 am

how many times these threads gonna be made. aint no one ever agree. shits jus stupid :smh:

PmoneY
superior
Posts: 4616
Joined: November 10th, 2012, 5:23 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by PmoneY » March 20th, 2013, 10:54 am

What N*ggaz got f*cked up is that they think L.A is super bigger than chicago.....

Not too long ago and im talking 30/40 years did california pass new york as most populous state and also not too long ago did los angeles pass chicago in population........

For a fair comparison we compare South L.A with a pop of around 500"000 people compared to South chicago with a pop of 1 million people...... So overall L.A has more people but in each cities southside chicago has more people but South central put up more gang related homicidesin history,i don't think that should even be argued......

What's misleading is the total population numbers because N*ggaz think if the city has more people it's supposed to have more murders but the real stats are in each cities worst areas.....

New york population is not really 8 million if you break it down by each borough/brooklyn if it's own city would be the 2nd biggest in america so in reality if L.A used the same system than L.A county could count as L.A city with a pop of over 9 .8 million people.......

The difference when comparing Chicago to L.A is that chicago only gets wild on the southside while in L.A the murders are wild everywhere from South central,watts ,compton & long beach.......

PmoneY
superior
Posts: 4616
Joined: November 10th, 2012, 5:23 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by PmoneY » March 20th, 2013, 11:01 am

Whoever said L.A only got 4 gangs are stupid .....

The super gangs in L.A are divided into separate sets....

Crips

Bloods

Pirus

Hoovers

F 13

18st

Ms 13

Those are 7 super gangs that each have separate sets under them and they're all spread around the country.......

Latin kings and G.D are the only chi gangs that are in different regions.....

Nobody in vegas or watts ever heard of any of those gangs unless it was internet related but crips & bloods was a force around america since the 80"s due to crack distribution.......

PmoneY
superior
Posts: 4616
Joined: November 10th, 2012, 5:23 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by PmoneY » March 20th, 2013, 11:07 am

The vicelords are prolly only spread to downsouth but not east or west coast......

And to keep it 100 the gd & vl in the south are crip & blood influenced with the whole blue & red flagging that they be doing now......

User avatar
CW
boss
Posts: 2744
Joined: December 24th, 2011, 2:20 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by CW » March 20th, 2013, 11:34 am

HamburgKilla wrote:Denver boots for all ye silly arsed nihkas.


Grape Street Africanus stoll over to 043 ånd Wållåce, sonny boy. Vengeance for Reginald Denny aplenty.


Ye olde Detroit hath always been thine killingest.
Funny that Latin counts and grape street crips also are deep
In michigan is it true that 22 boys got bobby d?

HoodBeenUp
superior
Posts: 5464
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 12:53 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by HoodBeenUp » March 20th, 2013, 1:25 pm

Here comes another fake account pmoney :facepalm:
mods dead this thread. get pmoney some poms poms and a skirt

locside
soldier
Posts: 230
Joined: March 14th, 2013, 1:06 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by locside » March 20th, 2013, 4:31 pm

HoodBeenUp wrote:They understand they just can't accept it. They are truly sick in the head....they want to be known as the gang capitol because some newscaster called them that. Honestly there is no "gang capitol"

But if you want to go by what city has more violence, which is something not even worth bragging about anyway. Chicago, Detriot, Philly, New Orleans, Houston, Miami all had more violent crimes then LA :shrug:
Regardless the Black Parts of LA were and are way worse then any Black parts of Chicago(and LA black hoods are still Even worse the Chicago now since Blacks have lil population in LA,so the per capita black crime is way higher in Los Angeles then Chicago.)South Central LA were forever always be known as the toughest place to live for Black People.Chicago has way more Blacks then LA does Chicago got like 1.2 million blacks and Los Angeles Blacks have dwindled down to only about 500 or 600,000.So regardless of whatever u say the truth is the truth and for a young black man in South Central LA in the 80s and 90s he had a 1 in 3 chance of getting murdered.And if you cant Read the Title of the thread its SOUTH CENTRAL LA(Black Side) Vs SOUTH CHICAGO(Black Side).SOUTH CENTRAL WINS IN OVERALL GRIMEYNESS AND GANGSTA sh*t....and like I said before too I GIVES A PHUK ABOUT LA OR CHICAGO im just lettin u misguided foos know wussup.

Lawndale
underboss
Posts: 1324
Joined: November 25th, 2010, 5:55 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by Lawndale » March 20th, 2013, 4:38 pm

^^^^theeastoaklandboy

locside
soldier
Posts: 230
Joined: March 14th, 2013, 1:06 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by locside » March 20th, 2013, 4:45 pm

Lawndale wrote:^^^^theeastoaklandboy
Cuzz f*ck the bay area this AZN BOYZ CRIP ON MINE

Lawndale
underboss
Posts: 1324
Joined: November 25th, 2010, 5:55 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by Lawndale » March 20th, 2013, 5:00 pm

locside wrote:
Lawndale wrote:^^^^theeastoaklandboy
Cuzz f*ck the bay area this AZN BOYZ CRIP ON MINE
:lol: yup :lol:

locside
soldier
Posts: 230
Joined: March 14th, 2013, 1:06 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by locside » March 20th, 2013, 5:06 pm

Lawndale wrote:
locside wrote:
Lawndale wrote:^^^^theeastoaklandboy
Cuzz f*ck the bay area this AZN BOYZ CRIP ON MINE
:lol: yup :lol:
Haha Lawndale is a SUBURB boy.

HoodBeenUp
superior
Posts: 5464
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 12:53 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by HoodBeenUp » March 20th, 2013, 5:18 pm

Black parts of la are not worse then chicagos smh....not even worse then chicago detriot philly camden st louis new orleans....smh shut up troll before you got exposed

locside
soldier
Posts: 230
Joined: March 14th, 2013, 1:06 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by locside » March 20th, 2013, 5:27 pm

HoodBeenUp wrote:Black parts of la are not worse then chicagos smh....not even worse then chicago detriot philly camden st louis new orleans....smh shut up troll before you got exposed
South Central damn sure was worse then all those places,u aint knowin sh*t u the troll im gonna call u the CHICAGO TROLL.Anytime some mentions Chicago here come hoodbeenup with his eyes all red and sweatin cuzz he know South Central LA went the hardest of all time,anything you say aint gonna change my mind or "HISTORYS MIND".Chicago was never on the same level as South Central LA 700,000 people with almost 800 murders none of those cities u mentioned are anything hardcore like South Central.Just give up already CHICAGO TROLL.And nowadays even though LA murders are down the murder rate is still SkyRocket,the difference is East LA and Harbor Area arent as rowdy as before like in the 80s and 90s.Ur such a Chicago scholar u should know that u Chicago n*ggas were in awe of how big bad South Central n*ggas would just spray automatic weapons into crowds and crowds of people.even old chicago n*ggas was like oh them guy in blue they from LA LA land they some bad people.HAHA even SOUTH CENTRAL LA n*ggas SCARED U CHICAGO n*ggas.CHI TOWN n*ggas EVEN ADMITTED BLOODS FROM OUT OF TOWN WERE UP IN CHICAGO BANGIN AND SO WAS THE CRIPS.SO ALL UR MISINFO IS BOOTSY.

http://www.streetgangs.com/topics/1991/111291lach.html

Post Reply