South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

locside
soldier
Posts: 230
Joined: March 14th, 2013, 1:06 pm

South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by locside » March 18th, 2013, 5:14 pm

I read that when Los Angeles had 3 years in a row of over thousand murders each year in 1992,Los Angeles had 2 million people,not 3 million like it is now,South Central LA had 800 of the 1000 murders of Los Angeles during each of those years,so just think about that over 2400 murders in South Central LA in just 3 years,South Central by itself had more murders then all of Chicago has nowadays and almost as much as when Chicago used to get 900 murders in a year.So what was South Chicago getting back then?if Chicago got 900 murders a year in the 90s and South Central just by itself got 800 how can there even be a question to who used to gang bang the hardest? Im from Northern California so i really gives a fucc about LA or Chicago but im just acknowledging the facts,since LA and Chicago are usually the most talked about anyways.Is there any specific gang rivalry in Chicago that even came close to all the dead bloods and crips and every one in the way?
Attachments
crips.jpg
crips.jpg (32.94 KiB) Viewed 5030 times

northpole69
underboss
Posts: 1843
Joined: February 19th, 2012, 3:25 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by northpole69 » March 19th, 2013, 8:51 am

THAT WAS 20 YEARS AGO .. CALI AND LA ARE ho*s COMPARED TO THE CHI . ITS A FACT NIGAG .. 200 MURDERS A YEAR? COME ON

koz park
associate
Posts: 120
Joined: February 20th, 2013, 8:58 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by koz park » March 19th, 2013, 11:40 am

n*ggas from both cities is always gonna claim they city the hardest. But there aint too much difference between black hoods in any big city as far as violence go. Its just chi has more black hooods right now so thats why its worser than l.a.

User avatar
CW
boss
Posts: 2744
Joined: December 24th, 2011, 2:20 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by CW » March 19th, 2013, 11:49 am

locside wrote:I read that when Los Angeles had 3 years in a row of over thousand murders each year in 1992,Los Angeles had 2 million people,not 3 million like it is now,South Central LA had 800 of the 1000 murders of Los Angeles during each of those years,so just think about that over 2400 murders in South Central LA in just 3 years,South Central by itself had more murders then all of Chicago has nowadays and almost as much as when Chicago used to get 900 murders in a year.So what was South Chicago getting back then?if Chicago got 900 murders a year in the 90s and South Central just by itself got 800 how can there even be a question to who used to gang bang the hardest? Im from Northern California so i really gives a fucc about LA or Chicago but im just acknowledging the facts,since LA and Chicago are usually the most talked about anyways.Is there any specific gang rivalry in Chicago that even came close to all the dead bloods and crips and every one in the way?
Those Latin counts don't play
Those grape street crips don't play :2cents:

locside
soldier
Posts: 230
Joined: March 14th, 2013, 1:06 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by locside » March 19th, 2013, 2:25 pm

northpole69 wrote:THAT WAS 20 YEARS AGO .. CALI AND LA ARE ho*s COMPARED TO THE CHI . ITS A FACT NIGAG .. 200 MURDERS A YEAR? COME ON
20 years ago South Central had more violence then Chicago of any time period could imagine.And Northern California in 2013 way harder then Chicago n*gga.Oakland Richmond Vallejo Frisco Sac Town Stock Town Mo Town Salinas Merced Fresno Bakersfield n*gga northern Cali dont play.Chicago just one city then all the cities surrounding it are b*tch towns,all the surrounding cities in Cali are all crazy..............................................................And Los Angeles Murders went down because they did so much killing that every body is either dead or in prison now :2cents: :2cents: :2cents:

Master Beta
soldier
Posts: 238
Joined: May 10th, 2011, 11:46 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by Master Beta » March 19th, 2013, 2:32 pm

koz park wrote:n*ggas from both cities is always gonna claim they city the hardest. But there aint too much difference between black hoods in any big city as far as violence go. Its just chi has more black hooods right now so thats why its worser than l.a.
IN A NUTSHELL, YOU HAVE IT 100% RIGHT, AND THATS A SAD FACT

HoodBeenUp
superior
Posts: 5464
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 12:53 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by HoodBeenUp » March 19th, 2013, 2:39 pm

Stupid thread with false information and trolls :facepalm:

locside
soldier
Posts: 230
Joined: March 14th, 2013, 1:06 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by locside » March 19th, 2013, 5:39 pm

HoodBeenUp wrote:Stupid thread with false information and trolls :facepalm:
What are you talking about? Are u just mad that South Central Los Angeles was way worse then any other spot in the United States? the same way the news is talking about Chicago today,is the same way Los Angeles was in the spot light 10 fold back in the day.Bloods and Crips started a war that took more lives than any Chicago gang war in history. :2cents: and like I said..im a NORTHERN CALI AZN BOYZ CRIP..I aint even from LA, im just callin it like I see it.And ur only defense is callin out troll? n*gga phuk Chicago and Los Angeles im just speakin on whats real.over 15,000 killed just in South Central Los Angeles from 1982 to 1995.Chicago aint no where near that level of Violence not even close,and yea LA is safe nowadays,but like I said 15,000 killed and I bet 100,000 locked up in prison. :2cents:

User avatar
BigFoe
underboss
Posts: 907
Joined: May 22nd, 2012, 1:02 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by BigFoe » March 19th, 2013, 5:43 pm

where this dumb a$$ n*gga got his statitstics from? n*gga pulled iot out his a$$ apparently..

and i aint here to say which one is worst or talk about the past... im jus here to analyze facts

Facts: if it awsnt for chicago, that whole 5 point star, 6 point star.. folk/people sh*t would not exist.. Bloods would not be as big as they became if it wasnt for BPSN.. that self admitted. LA bloods in the 80s and 90s used to call themselve blood stones at one point anyway

Facts: chicago in the past decade been alot worst than LA.. more murders.. more robberies, etc...

Facts: Chicago has more gang members per total population than any city you can name right now.

:2cents: :2cents:

locside
soldier
Posts: 230
Joined: March 14th, 2013, 1:06 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by locside » March 19th, 2013, 5:53 pm

BigFoe wrote:where this dumb a$$ n*gga got his statitstics from? n*gga pulled iot out his a$$ apparently..

and i aint here to say which one is worst or talk about the past... im jus here to analyze facts

Facts: if it awsnt for chicago, that whole 5 point star, 6 point star.. folk/people sh*t would not exist.. Bloods would not be as big as they became if it wasnt for BPSN.. that self admitted. LA bloods in the 80s and 90s used to call themselve blood stones at one point anyway

Facts: chicago in the past decade been alot worst than LA.. more murders.. more robberies, etc...

Facts: Chicago has more gang members per total population than any city you can name right now.

:2cents: :2cents:
n*gga u dum All u gotta do is watch WHY WE BANG Dvd and it says 15,000 n*ggas been murdered in SOuth Central Los Angeles in 15 years do the math foo,the last decade is 2000s but in the 80s and 90s when all the cities were at there worst South Central was way worse then anything Chicago had to offer.And stop talking about Black P Stone cuzz if they was on they Chicago sh*t they wouldnt be Bloods :2cents: BPSN had to join Blood to fit in LA.Aint no n*ggas walkin around Los Angeles actin muslim and wearin only black talkin bout Black P Stones,n*gga they reppin Blood over every thing and slob a$$ bloods are only a gang of misfit n*ggas that made a gang cuzz they got scared of the big bad CRIPS and ese's

PmoneY
superior
Posts: 4616
Joined: November 10th, 2012, 5:23 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by PmoneY » March 19th, 2013, 5:58 pm

No bias n*gga....

Facts : Chicago was worse in the 70"s.....

Facts : Every city was wild in the 80"s.....

Facts : L.A was worser in the 90"s......

Facts : Chicago worser in the 2000"s........

Facts : L.A still is & has been gang capital since the 80"s ( more gangs & total gang members nationwide claiming crips & bloods ).....

Facts : No city is harder ,every city has a ghetto & historically Chicago been around longer than L.A committing crimes back in the Al capone days.....

Facts..... No city in american history including Chicago has ever seen violence that L.A was in the 90"s.......

User avatar
BigFoe
underboss
Posts: 907
Joined: May 22nd, 2012, 1:02 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by BigFoe » March 19th, 2013, 6:16 pm

locside wrote:
BigFoe wrote:where this dumb a$$ n*gga got his statitstics from? n*gga pulled iot out his a$$ apparently..

and i aint here to say which one is worst or talk about the past... im jus here to analyze facts

Facts: if it awsnt for chicago, that whole 5 point star, 6 point star.. folk/people sh*t would not exist.. Bloods would not be as big as they became if it wasnt for BPSN.. that self admitted. LA bloods in the 80s and 90s used to call themselve blood stones at one point anyway

Facts: chicago in the past decade been alot worst than LA.. more murders.. more robberies, etc...

Facts: Chicago has more gang members per total population than any city you can name right now.

:2cents: :2cents:
n*gga u dum All u gotta do is watch WHY WE BANG Dvd and it says 15,000 n*ggas been murdered in SOuth Central Los Angeles in 15 years do the math foo,the last decade is 2000s but in the 80s and 90s when all the cities were at there worst South Central was way worse then anything Chicago had to offer.And stop talking about Black P Stone cuzz if they was on they Chicago sh*t they wouldnt be Bloods :2cents: BPSN had to join Blood to fit in LA.Aint no n*ggas walkin around Los Angeles actin muslim and wearin only black talkin bout Black P Stones,n*gga they reppin Blood over every thing and slob a$$ bloods are only a gang of misfit n*ggas that made a gang cuzz they got scared of the big bad CRIPS and ese's

man you one dumb motha fucka.. yo a$$ probably like 15...

fact is theres about 10 diff gangs that started in chicago that are now nationwide and some even international....

but yall can keep talking about 90s and the past... chicago the capital of gangbanging now.. most gangmembers per population in america.. that aint no debate there.. murder capital too.. no debate there either

locside
soldier
Posts: 230
Joined: March 14th, 2013, 1:06 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by locside » March 19th, 2013, 6:22 pm

BigFoe wrote:
locside wrote:
BigFoe wrote:where this dumb a$$ n*gga got his statitstics from? n*gga pulled iot out his a$$ apparently..

and i aint here to say which one is worst or talk about the past... im jus here to analyze facts

Facts: if it awsnt for chicago, that whole 5 point star, 6 point star.. folk/people sh*t would not exist.. Bloods would not be as big as they became if it wasnt for BPSN.. that self admitted. LA bloods in the 80s and 90s used to call themselve blood stones at one point anyway

Facts: chicago in the past decade been alot worst than LA.. more murders.. more robberies, etc...

Facts: Chicago has more gang members per total population than any city you can name right now.

:2cents: :2cents:
n*gga u dum All u gotta do is watch WHY WE BANG Dvd and it says 15,000 n*ggas been murdered in SOuth Central Los Angeles in 15 years do the math foo,the last decade is 2000s but in the 80s and 90s when all the cities were at there worst South Central was way worse then anything Chicago had to offer.And stop talking about Black P Stone cuzz if they was on they Chicago sh*t they wouldnt be Bloods :2cents: BPSN had to join Blood to fit in LA.Aint no n*ggas walkin around Los Angeles actin muslim and wearin only black talkin bout Black P Stones,n*gga they reppin Blood over every thing and slob a$$ bloods are only a gang of misfit n*ggas that made a gang cuzz they got scared of the big bad CRIPS and ese's

man you one dumb motha fucka.. yo a$$ probably like 15...

fact is theres about 10 diff gangs that started in chicago that are now nationwide and some even international....

but yall can keep talking about 90s and the past... chicago the capital of gangbanging now.. most gangmembers per population in america.. that aint no debate there.. murder capital too.. no debate there either
n*gga u aint ever been Murder Capital so shut that sh*t down potna all the small cities are the murder capitals like Gary and Compton and Little Rock Flint Richmond and Camden,and Second u foos is Gang Capital in this new era full of dum a$$ n*ggas talkin about swag and yolo and all this dum sh*t these so yall can keep it,dont be mad that n*ggas else where stepped there game up and ur standin in chicago wit skinny jeans fighting over neighborhoods that arent even worth protecting,fact is the 90s was the hardest era of all time and Los Angeles held the crown in the hardest era of all time. :2cents:

User avatar
BigFoe
underboss
Posts: 907
Joined: May 22nd, 2012, 1:02 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by BigFoe » March 19th, 2013, 6:25 pm

locside wrote:
BigFoe wrote:
locside wrote:
BigFoe wrote:where this dumb a$$ n*gga got his statitstics from? n*gga pulled iot out his a$$ apparently..

and i aint here to say which one is worst or talk about the past... im jus here to analyze facts

Facts: if it awsnt for chicago, that whole 5 point star, 6 point star.. folk/people sh*t would not exist.. Bloods would not be as big as they became if it wasnt for BPSN.. that self admitted. LA bloods in the 80s and 90s used to call themselve blood stones at one point anyway

Facts: chicago in the past decade been alot worst than LA.. more murders.. more robberies, etc...

Facts: Chicago has more gang members per total population than any city you can name right now.

:2cents: :2cents:
n*gga u dum All u gotta do is watch WHY WE BANG Dvd and it says 15,000 n*ggas been murdered in SOuth Central Los Angeles in 15 years do the math foo,the last decade is 2000s but in the 80s and 90s when all the cities were at there worst South Central was way worse then anything Chicago had to offer.And stop talking about Black P Stone cuzz if they was on they Chicago sh*t they wouldnt be Bloods :2cents: BPSN had to join Blood to fit in LA.Aint no n*ggas walkin around Los Angeles actin muslim and wearin only black talkin bout Black P Stones,n*gga they reppin Blood over every thing and slob a$$ bloods are only a gang of misfit n*ggas that made a gang cuzz they got scared of the big bad CRIPS and ese's

man you one dumb motha fucka.. yo a$$ probably like 15...

fact is theres about 10 diff gangs that started in chicago that are now nationwide and some even international....

but yall can keep talking about 90s and the past... chicago the capital of gangbanging now.. most gangmembers per population in america.. that aint no debate there.. murder capital too.. no debate there either
n*gga u aint ever been Murder Capital so shut that sh*t down potna all the small cities are the murder capitals like Gary and Compton and Little Rock Flint Richmond and Camden,and Second u foos is Gang Capital in this new era full of dum a$$ n*ggas talkin about swag and yolo and all this dum sh*t these so yall can keep it,dont be mad that n*ggas else where stepped there game up and ur standin in chicago wit skinny jeans fighting over neighborhoods that arent even worth protecting,fact is the 90s was the hardest era of all time and Los Angeles held the crown in the hardest era of all time. :2cents:

are you dumb stupid or retarded? which one?

first off WE CURRENTLY the muder capital.. we tripled NYC's murder rate last year.. and they got 3x times as much people population wise...


and why is yo dumb a$$ talkin about skinny jeans? n*ggas in chi town dont rock skinny jeans.. thts some cali sh*t.. yall lame a$$ n*ggas in cali rock skinny jeanz and tie-die colors and say "WE JERKZ" f*ck outta here wit dat p*ssy sh*t....mexican gangs run cali anyway.. thas soft

locside
soldier
Posts: 230
Joined: March 14th, 2013, 1:06 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by locside » March 19th, 2013, 6:58 pm

BigFoe wrote:
locside wrote:
BigFoe wrote:
locside wrote:
BigFoe wrote:where this dumb a$$ n*gga got his statitstics from? n*gga pulled iot out his a$$ apparently..

and i aint here to say which one is worst or talk about the past... im jus here to analyze facts

Facts: if it awsnt for chicago, that whole 5 point star, 6 point star.. folk/people sh*t would not exist.. Bloods would not be as big as they became if it wasnt for BPSN.. that self admitted. LA bloods in the 80s and 90s used to call themselve blood stones at one point anyway

Facts: chicago in the past decade been alot worst than LA.. more murders.. more robberies, etc...

Facts: Chicago has more gang members per total population than any city you can name right now.

:2cents: :2cents:
n*gga u dum All u gotta do is watch WHY WE BANG Dvd and it says 15,000 n*ggas been murdered in SOuth Central Los Angeles in 15 years do the math foo,the last decade is 2000s but in the 80s and 90s when all the cities were at there worst South Central was way worse then anything Chicago had to offer.And stop talking about Black P Stone cuzz if they was on they Chicago sh*t they wouldnt be Bloods :2cents: BPSN had to join Blood to fit in LA.Aint no n*ggas walkin around Los Angeles actin muslim and wearin only black talkin bout Black P Stones,n*gga they reppin Blood over every thing and slob a$$ bloods are only a gang of misfit n*ggas that made a gang cuzz they got scared of the big bad CRIPS and ese's

man you one dumb motha fucka.. yo a$$ probably like 15...

fact is theres about 10 diff gangs that started in chicago that are now nationwide and some even international....

but yall can keep talking about 90s and the past... chicago the capital of gangbanging now.. most gangmembers per population in america.. that aint no debate there.. murder capital too.. no debate there either
n*gga u aint ever been Murder Capital so shut that sh*t down potna all the small cities are the murder capitals like Gary and Compton and Little Rock Flint Richmond and Camden,and Second u foos is Gang Capital in this new era full of dum a$$ n*ggas talkin about swag and yolo and all this dum sh*t these so yall can keep it,dont be mad that n*ggas else where stepped there game up and ur standin in chicago wit skinny jeans fighting over neighborhoods that arent even worth protecting,fact is the 90s was the hardest era of all time and Los Angeles held the crown in the hardest era of all time. :2cents:

are you dumb stupid or retarded? which one?

first off WE CURRENTLY the muder capital.. we tripled NYC's murder rate last year.. and they got 3x times as much people population wise...


and why is yo dumb a$$ talkin about skinny jeans? n*ggas in chi town dont rock skinny jeans.. thts some cali sh*t.. yall lame a$$ n*ggas in cali rock skinny jeanz and tie-die colors and say "WE JERKZ" f*ck outta here wit dat p*ssy sh*t....mexican gangs run cali anyway.. thas soft
n*gga those lil cities were murder capitals all in different years not one specifically,but it was never Chicago and chicago aint murder cap right now thats between New Orleans and Flint lil n*gga,and Mexican gangs is soft? u ever heard of Tijuana,Juarez or Sonora or Michoacan? those places have more bodies drop in a month then your city has in a year and guess what some of them mexicans make there living in California, u retarded tryna call others retarded to make ur self feel better.And yall do rock skinnys nikka every city has nikkas rockin that weak sh*t.and just cuzz u got more then New York City makes u the murder cap? naw ur trippin,Chicago aint no where near murder capital not even CLOSE.

User avatar
HamburgKilla
lieutenant
Posts: 357
Joined: September 4th, 2012, 8:46 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by HamburgKilla » March 19th, 2013, 7:08 pm

Denver boots for all ye silly arsed nihkas.


Grape Street Africanus stoll over to 043 ånd Wållåce, sonny boy. Vengeance for Reginald Denny aplenty.


Ye olde Detroit hath always been thine killingest.

User avatar
BigFoe
underboss
Posts: 907
Joined: May 22nd, 2012, 1:02 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by BigFoe » March 19th, 2013, 8:18 pm

HamburgKilla wrote:Denver boots for all ye silly arsed nihkas.


Grape Street Africanus stoll over to 043 ånd Wållåce, sonny boy. Vengeance for Reginald Denny aplenty.


Ye olde Detroit hath always been thine killingest.
word.. detroit may not have as many gangs, but its crime is far more rampant and much more consistent.. to the point "murder for hire" is a common term for smeone whos got a gun but no job

robberies, home invasions, arsen and shootings in general are mad common there too... seems like cops even gave up hope in detroit..

LA cant compare to detroit.. chicago might but difference is chicago has alot of gangs.. detroit doesnt and still the crime is rampant.. some of the crimes more rampant than chicago by far.. like home invasions

HoodBeenUp
superior
Posts: 5464
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 12:53 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by HoodBeenUp » March 19th, 2013, 10:29 pm

Detriot has less population then detriot. LA has more population then Chicago to, by 1 million people

Chicago had a higher murder per capita and violent crime in the 80s and 90s the ny and la.

They just had more total people so they had more total crime. Why does this need to be repeated all the time?

locside
soldier
Posts: 230
Joined: March 14th, 2013, 1:06 pm

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by locside » March 19th, 2013, 11:09 pm

HoodBeenUp wrote:Detriot has less population then detriot. LA has more population then Chicago to, by 1 million people

Chicago had a higher murder per capita and violent crime in the 80s and 90s the ny and la.

They just had more total people so they had more total crime. Why does this need to be repeated all the time?
Los Angeles had 2 Million people in the 80s and 90s,Chicago had 2 million almost 3 million in the 80s and 90s,u must not remember that Chicago has recently been having people move out of the city.and Los Angeles constantly clocked more homicides and gang related homicides then Chicago,South Central Los Angeles just by its little self almost had as many murders as all of Chicago back in its worst years.Chicago 2.7 million/over 900 murders South Central LA 500,000/Over 700.....Los Angles 2.9 million/over 1000 murders......do u get my drift lil guy?

User avatar
BigFoe
underboss
Posts: 907
Joined: May 22nd, 2012, 1:02 am

Re: South Central LA vs.South Chicago(Non Bias)

Post by BigFoe » March 19th, 2013, 11:36 pm

locside wrote:
HoodBeenUp wrote:Detriot has less population then detriot. LA has more population then Chicago to, by 1 million people

Chicago had a higher murder per capita and violent crime in the 80s and 90s the ny and la.

They just had more total people so they had more total crime. Why does this need to be repeated all the time?
Los Angeles had 2 Million people in the 80s and 90s,Chicago had 2 million almost 3 million in the 80s and 90s,u must not remember that Chicago has recently been having people move out of the city.and Los Angeles constantly clocked more homicides and gang related homicides then Chicago,South Central Los Angeles just by its little self almost had as many murders as all of Chicago back in its worst years.Chicago 2.7 million/over 900 murders South Central LA 500,000/Over 700.....Los Angles 2.9 million/over 1000 murders......do u get my drift lil guy?
here let me shut this little p*ssy a$$ up... with his fake a$$ statistics ... actin like u contiributed to that crime rate when yo b*tch a$$ was still suckin ya momma left titty for milk

Violent Crimes Per City 1990-1994 US Census

1990
Chicago - 2,842.2
LA - 2,404.6
NYC - 2,383.6
New Orleans - 2,259.2
Long Beach - 1,956.8
Cleveland - 1,817.6
San Francisco - 1,711.1
Oakland - 1,570.2
Memphis - 1,488.0
Houston - 1,388.3
Philadelphia - 1,348.8
1991
Chicago - 3,092.5
LA - 2,525.8
Oakland - 2,495.8
NYC - 2,318.2
New Orleans - 2,190.3
Long Beach - 2,100.7
Cleveland - 1,831.9
San Francisco - 1,645.4
Houston - 1,599.9
Memphis - 1,422.3
Philadelphia - 1,406.1
1992
Chicago - 2,840.4
Oakland - 2,626.4
LA - 2,459.5
NYC - 2,163.7
New Orleans - 1,981.6
San Francisco - 1,821.3
Cleveland - 1,661.6
Long Beach - 1,554.8
Memphis - 1,552.6
Houston - 1,465.1
Philadelphia - 1,191.2
1993
Chicago - 2,717.4
Oakland - 2,601.6
LA - 2,374.3
NYC - 2,089.8
New Orleans - 2,039.0
San Francisco - 1,815.0
Cleveland - 1,643.2
Memphis - 1,633.8
Long Beach - 1,605.4
Houston - 1,453.8
Philadelphia - 1,255.2
1994
Chicago - 2,684.5
Oakland - 2,193.9
LA - 2,059.0
New Orleans - 1,886.9
NYC - 1,860.9
Memphis - 1,568.3
Cleveland - 1,529.7
San Francisco - 1,461.4
Long Beach - 1,416.7
Philadelphia - 1,322.5
Houston - 1,307.5

During that time, SF's murder rate was never all that high compared to many cities (it peaked in the 90's at 17.5 murders per 100k residents in 1993, with a total of 130 murders...the previous record was 142 murders in 1977). SF did have a pretty high robbery rate however. Here are all of those cities I listed, with their robbery rates from 1990 to 1994 averaged out (and with their 2007 robbery rates for comparison):

Chicago = 1344.3 (546.1)
New York = 1221.24 (265.0)
New Orleans = 1099.2 (523.1)
Oakland = 1065.4 (875.1)
Los Angeles = 1040.82 (348.3)
San Francisco = 1013.6 (513.9)
Cleveland = 893.0 (914.3)
Long Beach = 863.08 (317.7)
Philadelphia = 792.3 (714.6)
Memphis = 783.36 (727.7)
Houston = 694.9 (529.1)


Post Reply