And how are Gabielos related to half your ancestors the Aztecs?213LOS wrote:Are you serious about quoting wikipedia? Anybody can write anything on there. I can go on there and write anything.2wo-g wrote:Hes talking about black mexicans, where mexican slavery more or less died after the mexican war of independence they had more freedom in Mexico than the US. I did some actual research around & its pretty interesting.213LOS wrote:realSHIT is full of sh*t. How are you keeping it real when you just said Native Mexicans weren't the 1st Los Angelenos? You're trying to play up neegroes as if they're superstars. Understand the facts. Slavery did not until 1863. The city of LA had already been in existence since 1771 (with no blacks in site). That's a 92 year difference. Anyway, you're stupid as f*ck and hope you're just being a d*ck.Realspit wrote:My homie tell me the truth about how mexicans are raised. We don't lie, I tell him about ignorant n*gga mind state too. We keep it real that's why we homies.GEE213 wrote:Do you tell your buddy how you feel majority of that foos people are racist black haters n sh*t?...Realspit wrote:How did I talk about taxa here, show me. I'm about proof, don't talk mass and not back it up.GEE213 wrote:Realspit wrote: ima still kick it w my Mexican homeboy from comptone later.
But 213 aint a real southsider even the real Mexican G's said that on here plenty of times.
@gee u peep the facts I put down or u still on some fat mullato rancher bit?
you talk to your mexican homeboy the way you talk about raza here?.......LA was basicly half mullato half indio...more indios by like 1 or 2.....and some spanish people...hows that majority black?...
Do I half to do the math. Over half the settlers were of African descent next was Indians, next was whites, one mestizo which u are,and one fillipino.
What good does it do to you, to try to downplay the black involvement in this city? You think I should sit there and let u lie on my people when they had a hand in this? I'm being serious...f*ck all that racist nonsense, and emotional sh*t them other fools doing. Speak from a raza point of view.
Wheres this fucken plaque your talking about?...where did you find out LA was started by blacks?...
i wanna see that sh*t...
what good does it do you to try and down play our culture?.....you doing the same sh*t your bitching about us doing...
I keep it real and give raza their props, but if my people gettin downplayed omw speak up. I ain't w the racist sh*t but I'm fasho w the real. Omw post pic of the plaque when I get to my comp. Give credit where it's due.
The Gabrieleno Indians are the true Los Angelenos.
The pobladores was the ones who founded LA, there was 44 of them. 10 was black or mixed, ( and 11 were indio or mixed, and 2 were fully white
Hate to burst bubbles, retardz, but, the black supremacist bullshit is just not true. The Gabieleno Indians have been in LA for THOUSANDS OF YEARS. This history is backed by archeological and scientific evidence.
The Tribe has been indigenous to the Los Angeles Basin for 7,000 years. This history is well- documented through 2,800 archaeological sites, in State historical records and federal archives, and Catholic church records at San Gabriel Mission and San Fernando Mission.
"A State historical site preserves the holy springs where the Portola Expedition, which founded the City of Los Angeles in the late 1700s, replenished their water. The Expedition encountered the Tongva, who guided them to their holy springs, at what is now University High School in West Los Angeles. The springs provide water to visitors today and are being restored with a $1 million state history grant."
Again, whatever venom you're spewing is just not true. :(
http://www.gabrielinotribe.org/TribalHi ... istory.cfm
those are two different tribes
furthermore we are talking about Los Angeles as a city, this land is not Gabielo Indian land anymore, but it's still Los Angeles! And the majority founders were black! Period
of we want to play the game of who was here first we can keep taking it back, civilization started in Africa, how far back do you want to take this bro?