WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

User avatar
CONFIDENTIAL
sergeant
Posts: 301
Joined: January 14th, 2017, 9:30 am

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by CONFIDENTIAL » January 15th, 2017, 10:49 pm

MurdaWoodz438 wrote:@Pmoney yeah but blacks in the 1919 Chicago riots killed 15 whites. n*ggas in the LA riots only killed 5 white people. Y'all be frontin y'all sh*t hard as hell boy :lmao:
LA n*ggas SCARED OF WHITE PEOPLE AND MEXICANS! LA n*ggas A DISGRACE TO BLACK PEOPLE. THESE n*ggas PREACH "NO SNITCHING" AND ACT LIKE THEY HARD BUT WHEN THINGS GET ROUGH THEY HOLD HANDS WITH THE POLICE CAUSE THEY DONT WANT TO PROBLEMS! :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Image
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: BLACK PEOPLE KILLS OTHER BLACK PEOPLE, BLACK PEOPLE RETALIATE WITH FORCE. WHITE POLICE KILLS BLACK PEOPLE, BLACK PEOPLE WANT PEACE! THESE n*ggas MAKE ME SICK TO MY STOMACH.

User avatar
CONFIDENTIAL
sergeant
Posts: 301
Joined: January 14th, 2017, 9:30 am

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by CONFIDENTIAL » January 15th, 2017, 10:50 pm

Image

MurdaWoodz438
underboss
Posts: 1177
Joined: September 21st, 2012, 12:29 pm

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by MurdaWoodz438 » January 15th, 2017, 11:09 pm

CONFIDENTIAL wrote:
MurdaWoodz438 wrote:@Pmoney yeah but blacks in the 1919 Chicago riots killed 15 whites. n*ggas in the LA riots only killed 5 white people. Y'all be frontin y'all sh*t hard as hell boy :lmao:
LA n*ggas SCARED OF WHITE PEOPLE AND MEXICANS! LA n*ggas A DISGRACE TO BLACK PEOPLE. THESE n*ggas PREACH "NO SNITCHING" AND ACT LIKE THEY HARD BUT WHEN THINGS GET ROUGH THEY HOLD HANDS WITH THE POLICE CAUSE THEY DONT WANT TO PROBLEMS! :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Image
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: BLACK PEOPLE KILLS OTHER BLACK PEOPLE, BLACK PEOPLE RETALIATE WITH FORCE. WHITE POLICE KILLS BLACK PEOPLE, BLACK PEOPLE WANT PEACE! THESE n*ggas MAKE ME SICK TO MY STOMACH.
Fr this n*gga PmoneY had me thinkin they was really puttin work in on the whites. I shoulda known that was some bullshit just by lookin at how they get treated by Mexicans today :lol:
Attachments
qa4uaeC.jpg
qa4uaeC.jpg (351.58 KiB) Viewed 697 times

MurdaWoodz438
underboss
Posts: 1177
Joined: September 21st, 2012, 12:29 pm

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by MurdaWoodz438 » January 15th, 2017, 11:13 pm

CONFIDENTIAL wrote:Image
p*ssy boys don't won't War! :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

townbizzEa$T O
prince
Posts: 8103
Joined: August 29th, 2015, 1:58 am

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by townbizzEa$T O » January 15th, 2017, 11:37 pm

i say LA kuz them murder numbers they was gettin but if u went by most grimey gangsta that would be a better topic for that i like fort more kuz he went against government n all a true G who didnt shy away from the true enemy la had wars with police too jeff fort terrioist plans on another level
NEVER ASK WAT MY SECTION DO
IF IT AINT BOUT MONEY I AINT CHECKED FA U

MONSOON
underboss
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 17th, 2016, 2:20 am

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by MONSOON » January 16th, 2017, 12:27 am

[quote="PmoneY"]@Murda,Why are you posting the same article that HoodProphet always posted ? Tf is going on here lol

What does more brutal gang history have to do with that article ???

And L.A,Watts,Compton,Inglewood gangs are blocks away from each other so it's all L.A at the end of the day.

N*ggaz in Watts can bust on N*ggaz in South Central,
Compton can bust on N*ggaz in Watt,South Central & Inglewood are separated by 1 street so how can those places not be included in L.A city activity ? We all go the same county jail lol,Indiana & Chicago dont share the same jailhouse

L.A is built different just like New York and tha 5 boroughs

So it's unfair kuz Chicago not big enough.....

Yeah Chicago put up bodies but overall tha L.A gang war is all over the world now[/quote]

The nations are all over America lol crips and bloods Just got all the attention earlier esp in the 90's and Early 2000's bc of rappers and movies Boyz n the hood,menace etc mainstream media made L.A. gangs popular

MONSOON
underboss
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 17th, 2016, 2:20 am

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by MONSOON » January 16th, 2017, 12:29 am

Now look at how many n*ggas wannabe BDs GDs etc etc since that drill sh*t n*ggas in cities where that sh*t wasn't even heard of there 15 years ago... Media!

MONSOON
underboss
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 17th, 2016, 2:20 am

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by MONSOON » January 16th, 2017, 12:39 am

[quote="MurdaWoodz438"][quote="CONFIDENTIAL"][quote="MurdaWoodz438"]@Pmoney yeah but blacks in the 1919 Chicago riots killed 15 whites. n*ggas in the LA riots only killed 5 white people. Y'all be frontin y'all sh*t hard as hell boy :lmao:[/quote]
LA n*ggas SCARED OF WHITE PEOPLE AND MEXICANS! LA n*ggas A DISGRACE TO BLACK PEOPLE. THESE n*ggas PREACH "NO SNITCHING" AND ACT LIKE THEY HARD BUT WHEN THINGS GET ROUGH THEY HOLD HANDS WITH THE POLICE CAUSE THEY DONT WANT TO PROBLEMS! :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
[img]https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q ... 5992179492[/img]
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: BLACK PEOPLE KILLS OTHER BLACK PEOPLE, BLACK PEOPLE RETALIATE WITH FORCE. WHITE POLICE KILLS BLACK PEOPLE, BLACK PEOPLE WANT PEACE! THESE n*ggas MAKE ME SICK TO MY STOMACH.[/quote]

Fr this n*gga PmoneY had me thinkin they was really puttin work in on the whites. I shoulda known that was some bullshit just by lookin at how they get treated by Mexicans today :lol:[/quote]

Y'all n*ggas talking like n*ggas in L.A. soft the Mexicans super deep and n*ggas in L.A. still there I met several n*ggas from Cali most it and one that moved bk to the crib ...them n*ggas be riding on Mexicans too if they were so weak it should be no more crips and bloods Mexicans should have took all there land that blk Mexicans sh*t been going on probably since at least since the 80's atleast in prison if not before...Plus them n*ggas told me in the 90's when it was really going down they would go to ovals neighborhood not even on missions just on some I'll box anyone one of you n*ggas and they would honor it :lmao: them n*ggas Insane jack :lmao: I wouldn't take that chance hoping the rivals Honor a fair one :lmao:

PmoneY
superior
Posts: 4615
Joined: November 10th, 2012, 5:23 am

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by PmoneY » January 16th, 2017, 1:33 am

Cities with the most police shooting people.




1. Chicago, 70 deaths

2. Phoenix, 57 Deaths

3. Philadelphia, 54 deaths

4. Houston, 49 deaths

5. Los Angeles, 47 deaths

6. New York, 41 deaths

7. Dallas, 34 deaths

8. San Antonio, 28 deaths

9. San Diego, 17 deaths

10. San Jose, 11 deaths

PmoneY
superior
Posts: 4615
Joined: November 10th, 2012, 5:23 am

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by PmoneY » January 16th, 2017, 1:39 am

http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/27/heres ... shootings/

@Murda,n*gga it's a million Black's still in the city of Chicago,Yall not by the border outnumbered and going against everything in prison....

Remember that white boy that got snatched out his truck and hit in the head with a brick ? n*gga tha L.A riots lasted for 3 days until tha National guard was called in....

PmoneY
superior
Posts: 4615
Joined: November 10th, 2012, 5:23 am

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by PmoneY » January 16th, 2017, 1:44 am

When the riots ended on August 3, 15 whites and 23 blacks had been killed and more than 500 people injured; an additional 1,000 black families had lost their homes when they were torched by rioters.

1919 Chicago riots,You bragging on 15 whites but 23 Black's was killed with a 1000 more who lost their homes..

Than 70 N*ggaz was killed by police in Chicago but this is what you love to talk about.....

L.A N*ggaz and everywhere else going through bs with Police as well...But Chicago is due for another riot since they just killed a little black boy and nothing happened....

Now enjoy your weekend n*gga lol
Im watching this Game.

MONSOON
underboss
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 17th, 2016, 2:20 am

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by MONSOON » January 16th, 2017, 1:50 am

I meant up top most I met ot..And Mexicans should have took all the land from blk gangs,and the racial sh*t been going on at least in prisons there maybe since the 70's or 80's if L.A. n*ggas was that weak their land should have been taken over by the Mexicans*

murksiderock
boss
Posts: 2363
Joined: July 7th, 2011, 9:42 pm

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by murksiderock » January 16th, 2017, 3:00 am

This Chicago/LA thing will never die on this site... :smh: :facepalm: ...I'ma take a more intellectual approach to this argument...

Chicago is worse, has always been worse, city to city murder rates:

80s: Los Angeles: 851/26.47, Chicago: 738/25.37
90s: Chicago: 820/29.11, Los Angeles: 779/22.08
00s: Chicago: 534/18.71, Los Angeles: 489/12.77
10s (so far): Chicago: 443/16.19, Los Angeles: 280/7.35

That don't change the fact that LA birthed some legendary street movements...

Those of you who never been to LA, you gotta understand, Los Angeles has never been a city that had a lot of black people. Ever. This stuff matters when you're talking about historically black street gangs. LA's worst decade was the '80s. That's also the decade that LA had its largest black population at 16.7%. Chicago worst decade was the '90s, when it was 40% black:

80s: Chi 39.5% black, LA 16.7% black
90s: Chi 38.7% black, LA 13.3% black
00s: Chi 36.4% black, LA 11.4% black
10s: Chi 32.9% black, LA 9.6% black

LA's black population is down over 42% since 1980, and still dropping. Chicago's black population is down 17% since 1980, and still dropping. But Chicago black population is still 3.5 times more than that in LA. So anybody with a brain can infer a few things here:

One, Chicago is the worse city overall, has more bad hoods, and the worst hoods in Chicago are worse than the worst hoods in LA. That isn't a new thing and it's pretty much always been that way between the two cities--Chicago is the worst city, overall...

Two, black gangs and black street n*ggas in LA are putting in just as much, if not more, work than black gangs and black street n*ggas in Chi, because blacks in LA streets are heavily outnumbered. LA murder rate in the 80s was more than Chi with a waaaaayyyy less black population. What does that tell you bout what black LA cats was doing in the streets? They was busier than blacks in Chi streets...

LA is one of the most hostile cities for blacks in America. America in general is hostile to blacks but I'd say blacks are treated worse in LA than in Chi by far. The reason I'd never want to live in California again, is because of how thoughtless and disregarded blacks are from a governmental and cultural standpoint. Blacks have it exponentially better on the East Coast, no contest, and I'm a black man about to raise a black daughter. If I have to live in a racist country, I'd rather find the place where my people are more celebrated and more respected, if only slightly...

My aunt moved to LA in 81/82 with my uncle and cousin (RIP) from Arkansas because my cousin had sickle cell and couldn't get elite medical care in Arkansas, but could in LA. I had one uncle and another aunt follow her to LA in the '80s. They've shared they experiences with me, a whole lot of positives, but blacks have always been outcast in LA...

So for those of you who never been to LA, you can't really comprehend the fact that brothers our there are oppressed to another level. Then they hit the jails, the pen, same story. Blacks in Illinois jails are the majority. People can't racially attack blacks because blacks got the numbers. In LA, they don't have numbers...

End of the day, people are people and ain't much difference between the people. But the street ethics and environment is completely different, and though Chicago is the worse city, it's not accurate to say Chi n*ggas are more ruthless. Honestly should be a draw here when you consider what black street n*ggas in LA have to live with!

Crooked$ipp
captain
Posts: 475
Joined: November 2nd, 2010, 1:14 pm

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by Crooked$ipp » January 16th, 2017, 3:04 am

It's equal at the end of the day. Your speaking all the way back to the 1920s for both cities and it just escalated into the 60s-90s. Various factors affected both cities differently from city politics, street politics, and prison politics. Law Enforcement have both been dirty in dealing with their gang problems and innocents still got harmed & killed over mistaken I.d. No matter how you define brutal, grimey , ruthless , etc. It's all synonymous.

Different angle, Who was more focus on money than banging itself? Anybody can pull a trigger.

Crooked$ipp
captain
Posts: 475
Joined: November 2nd, 2010, 1:14 pm

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by Crooked$ipp » January 16th, 2017, 3:05 am

murksiderock wrote:This Chicago/LA thing will never die on this site... :smh: :facepalm: ...I'ma take a more intellectual approach to this argument...

Chicago is worse, has always been worse, city to city murder rates:

80s: Los Angeles: 851/26.47, Chicago: 738/25.37
90s: Chicago: 820/29.11, Los Angeles: 779/22.08
00s: Chicago: 534/18.71, Los Angeles: 489/12.77
10s (so far): Chicago: 443/16.19, Los Angeles: 280/7.35

That don't change the fact that LA birthed some legendary street movements...

Those of you who never been to LA, you gotta understand, Los Angeles has never been a city that had a lot of black people. Ever. This stuff matters when you're talking about historically black street gangs. LA's worst decade was the '80s. That's also the decade that LA had its largest black population at 16.7%. Chicago worst decade was the '90s, when it was 40% black:

80s: Chi 39.5% black, LA 16.7% black
90s: Chi 38.7% black, LA 13.3% black
00s: Chi 36.4% black, LA 11.4% black
10s: Chi 32.9% black, LA 9.6% black

LA's black population is down over 42% since 1980, and still dropping. Chicago's black population is down 17% since 1980, and still dropping. But Chicago black population is still 3.5 times more than that in LA. So anybody with a brain can infer a few things here:

One, Chicago is the worse city overall, has more bad hoods, and the worst hoods in Chicago are worse than the worst hoods in LA. That isn't a new thing and it's pretty much always been that way between the two cities--Chicago is the worst city, overall...

Two, black gangs and black street n*ggas in LA are putting in just as much, if not more, work than black gangs and black street n*ggas in Chi, because blacks in LA streets are heavily outnumbered. LA murder rate in the 80s was more than Chi with a waaaaayyyy less black population. What does that tell you bout what black LA cats was doing in the streets? They was busier than blacks in Chi streets...

LA is one of the most hostile cities for blacks in America. America in general is hostile to blacks but I'd say blacks are treated worse in LA than in Chi by far. The reason I'd never want to live in California again, is because of how thoughtless and disregarded blacks are from a governmental and cultural standpoint. Blacks have it exponentially better on the East Coast, no contest, and I'm a black man about to raise a black daughter. If I have to live in a racist country, I'd rather find the place where my people are more celebrated and more respected, if only slightly...

My aunt moved to LA in 81/82 with my uncle and cousin (RIP) from Arkansas because my cousin had sickle cell and couldn't get elite medical care in Arkansas, but could in LA. I had one uncle and another aunt follow her to LA in the '80s. They've shared they experiences with me, a whole lot of positives, but blacks have always been outcast in LA...

So for those of you who never been to LA, you can't really comprehend the fact that brothers our there are oppressed to another level. Then they hit the jails, the pen, same story. Blacks in Illinois jails are the majority. People can't racially attack blacks because blacks got the numbers. In LA, they don't have numbers...

End of the day, people are people and ain't much difference between the people. But the street ethics and environment is completely different, and though Chicago is the worse city, it's not accurate to say Chi n*ggas are more ruthless. Honestly should be a draw here when you consider what black street n*ggas in LA have to live with!
Don't forget to add the Latinos, Whites, Asians, & Others too. It's not exclusively Blacks adding to the banging drama.

MONSOON
underboss
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 17th, 2016, 2:20 am

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by MONSOON » January 16th, 2017, 3:11 am

Unfortunately n*ggas are ruthless everywhere major cities get more hype from the media..The sh*t really ain't nothing to be proud of they print that sh*t to show we are uncivilized savages so when unarmed blks youth get shot then the perpetrator (if they are white) don'tget charged or no prison time or a slap on the wrist...They using that sh*t to militarize the police force even more and possibly to call in the national guard.. It's a strategic game for power..We better know it!

murksiderock
boss
Posts: 2363
Joined: July 7th, 2011, 9:42 pm

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by murksiderock » January 16th, 2017, 3:20 am

At my boy Sharif lol:

There are other groups of people contributing to the violence in both cities, but when you talk about LA and Chi, most people think about the black street gangs. There's whites and Latin sh*t obviously playing into the drama, but in LA specifically, the black gangs were the largest drivers of violent crime in The War Years. Chicago has a different history, I can't specifically speak on them...

You from DeSoto? Are you Folks? I'm trying to put two and two together lol. I know some cats from DeSoto...

littlemission
fresh meat
Posts: 1
Joined: January 16th, 2017, 3:16 am

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by littlemission » January 16th, 2017, 3:23 am

Probably LA but nowadays Chicago is way more violent than LA

LA homicide rate - 7 Chicago - 29

Crooked$ipp
captain
Posts: 475
Joined: November 2nd, 2010, 1:14 pm

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by Crooked$ipp » January 16th, 2017, 3:33 am

murksiderock wrote:At my boy Sharif lol:

There are other groups of people contributing to the violence in both cities, but when you talk about LA and Chi, most people think about the black street gangs. There's whites and Latin sh*t obviously playing into the drama, but in LA specifically, the black gangs were the largest drivers of violent crime in The War Years. Chicago has a different history, I can't specifically speak on them...

You from DeSoto? Are you Folks? I'm trying to put two and two together lol. I know some cats from DeSoto...
Including the 90s ( War Years?) I would think them Surenos be up there too. Chi just diverse but back then too you had more active whites banging (50s-70s) along with Blacks & Latinos .

Naw from GTA. Been up & down the State though.

MurdaWoodz438
underboss
Posts: 1177
Joined: September 21st, 2012, 12:29 pm

Re: WHOSE GANG HISTORY IS MORE BRUTAL AND GRIMEY LOS ANGELES OR CHICAGO?

Post by MurdaWoodz438 » January 16th, 2017, 3:50 am

@PmoneY n*gga 25 blacks got killed in the LA riots. Only 5 white people got merked though. Yeah 23 blacks died in the 1919 Chicago riots but n*gga we took 15 whites with us. You literally said LA riots was the worst riots ever and you the only one who bragged about a riot you're delusional :plank:

Post Reply