All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

User avatar
The Chosen One
ooog
ooog
Posts: 21158
Joined: September 18th, 2013, 8:38 pm

All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by The Chosen One » March 21st, 2017, 7:17 am

[youtube]<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/75RJmy_h9yI?ecver=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/youtube]
[youtube]<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zKaBBB-3M7Y?ecver=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/youtube]
[youtube]<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lhbadzpzJPY?ecver=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/youtube]

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :chinamike: :chinamike: :chinamike: :chinamike:

User avatar
The Chosen One
ooog
ooog
Posts: 21158
Joined: September 18th, 2013, 8:38 pm

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by The Chosen One » March 21st, 2017, 7:22 am

SHIT ASOON AS I LOG ON AND POST THATS WHEN WOLFPACK LEAVES.. THAT FOOL REALLY DONT LIKE ME :wow: :ohlawd: :ohlawd: :wow:

OLDxENGLISH
boss
boss
Posts: 2703
Joined: November 29th, 2013, 4:12 pm

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by OLDxENGLISH » March 21st, 2017, 8:15 am

This cant be true, Blacks and Whites can produce babies who can also produce off spring, if Blacks and Whites were that much percentage different as species, all black white mixed children would be sterile and not able to make babies, like Mules, Ligers and others like them.
Central Valley to the Bay, From LA the C-A......... is where we posted up, its like this every single dizzay.

User avatar
SuperSweet
superior
superior
Posts: 3400
Joined: July 6th, 2015, 4:14 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by SuperSweet » March 21st, 2017, 8:15 am

Good! :tiphat:

I don't want that rhesus monkey shit in my dna

Image

Fake Deleted
superior
superior
Posts: 5515
Joined: January 21st, 2015, 3:50 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by Fake Deleted » March 21st, 2017, 8:43 am

SuperSpic, you're a germ which means you're mixed. You're not 100% Spanish at all, you just speak the Latin language. Spaniards call y'all spics because you are a germ to them. They don't respect your mixed D.N.A :lol:

User avatar
JerseyCity201
boss
boss
Posts: 2365
Joined: March 2nd, 2009, 12:18 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by JerseyCity201 » March 21st, 2017, 8:49 am

This type of shit interest me

1️⃣
underboss
underboss
Posts: 1944
Joined: June 4th, 2014, 5:24 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by 1️⃣ » March 21st, 2017, 8:54 am

Tribe wrote:SuperSpic, you're a germ which means you're mixed. You're not 100% Spanish at all, you just speak the Latin language. Spaniards call y'all spics because you are a germ to them. They don't respect your mixed D.N.A :lol:
You fuckin moron. Spaniards dont use the term spic. That a U.S. term faggot.

User avatar
JerseyCity201
boss
boss
Posts: 2365
Joined: March 2nd, 2009, 12:18 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by JerseyCity201 » March 21st, 2017, 9:07 am

OriginalEnglish wrote:This cant be true, Blacks and Whites can produce babies who can also produce off spring, if Blacks and Whites were that much percentage different as species, all black white mixed children would be sterile and not able to make babies, like Mules, Ligers and others like them.
If something is close enough related they can create hybrids that can breed. You are using examples where the animals are related enough to breed but not produce offspring. Wolf dogs, Bengal cats are better examples of different animals closely related enough to breed and their offspring still breed.

I breed snakes for a hobby and side business, so I know about examples of this occuring naturally in the wild too as well as in the hobby. For example you can get a Diamond Python crossed with Carpet Python and them breed back out.

Fake Deleted
superior
superior
Posts: 5515
Joined: January 21st, 2015, 3:50 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by Fake Deleted » March 21st, 2017, 10:35 am

#1 wrote:
Tribe wrote:SuperSpic, you're a germ which means you're mixed. You're not 100% Spanish at all, you just speak the Latin language. Spaniards call y'all spics because you are a germ to them. They don't respect your mixed D.N.A :lol:
You fuckin moron. Spaniards dont use the term spic. That a U.S. term faggot.
It came from the European Spanish you dick head. They don't fuck with y'all germ asses. They call y'all spics all up & down Spain because y'all not real Spanish like them. They hate y'all mixed dirty tainted D.N.A y'all so proud of. They see y'all as diseases to real Spanish.

1️⃣
underboss
underboss
Posts: 1944
Joined: June 4th, 2014, 5:24 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by 1️⃣ » March 21st, 2017, 11:35 am

Tribe wrote:
#1 wrote:
Tribe wrote:SuperSpic, you're a germ which means you're mixed. You're not 100% Spanish at all, you just speak the Latin language. Spaniards call y'all spics because you are a germ to them. They don't respect your mixed D.N.A :lol:
You fuckin moron. Spaniards dont use the term spic. That a U.S. term faggot.
It came from the European Spanish you dick head. They don't fuck with y'all germ asses. They call y'all spics all up & down Spain because y'all not real Spanish like them. They hate y'all mixed dirty tainted D.N.A y'all so proud of. They see y'all as diseases to real Spanish.
You the stupidest mothafucka ever.

Ya whole blood line can suck my dick, idiot.

Fake Deleted
superior
superior
Posts: 5515
Joined: January 21st, 2015, 3:50 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by Fake Deleted » March 21st, 2017, 12:17 pm

You mad you dirty spic ass germ? Spanish Europeans don't respect you filthy spics because y'all D.N.A is mixed with Africans :lol: But neither side accept you disease spic ass bastards and Spaniards are the worse because they the ones that cut y'all filthy spic asses off 1st & till this day y'all dying to be like them when they don't fuck with y'all :lmao:

1️⃣
underboss
underboss
Posts: 1944
Joined: June 4th, 2014, 5:24 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by 1️⃣ » March 21st, 2017, 12:30 pm

Im mad that youre so fucking dumb.

Spic is a term created in the U.S. Spaniards were also called spic at a point in time even during the prohibition era.

Hispanics, Spaniards and Italians are also called dagos but that term just like "Wop" and "ginny" are now terms more known for the Italians.



Lastly, youre a fucking bozo coward and your comfort comes from talking shit knowing that you will forever duck and avoid anybody and wont confront anyone with that same energy and your fake ass delusional mind state created gang. You get ya face ripped the fuck off.


Now go back on your medications you schizo.

User avatar
SuperSweet
superior
superior
Posts: 3400
Joined: July 6th, 2015, 4:14 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by SuperSweet » March 21st, 2017, 12:32 pm

Tribe wrote:You mad you dirty spic ass germ? Spanish Europeans don't respect you filthy spics because y'all D.N.A is mixed with Africans :lol: But neither side accept you disease spic ass bastards and Spaniards are the worse because they the ones that cut y'all filthy spic asses off 1st & till this day y'all dying to be like them when they don't fuck with y'all :lmao:
Look at this mooley

REAL afocans from afroca, don't fuck with you mtumwas (AAs), in this country. That rbg shit doesn't mean anything to REAL Africans :killself: :lol: You fucking Abeed :lol:

1️⃣
underboss
underboss
Posts: 1944
Joined: June 4th, 2014, 5:24 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by 1️⃣ » March 21st, 2017, 12:39 pm

And my cousin lives in Spain, married to a Spaniard and has children with her.

But this fuckboy RBG/Trib/X/AppleCityFaggot/and the list goes on doesnt know anything because he doesnt move around and is reduced to his room in a housing development for mentally unstable people and trainstation wi-fi for his bum ass phone.

User avatar
2wo-G
king
king
Posts: 9241
Joined: August 7th, 2013, 12:46 pm

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by 2wo-G » March 21st, 2017, 1:46 pm

This is one of the more really stupid arguments that dumb ass Instagram 'woke' black People use. First off it ain't even true, Neanderthals mostly lived throughout PArts of of Europe & West Asia (including Israel Chili).

Also, even if it was true....so what? What does that get you? Africans still got it dirty. It's such a minor thing to feel accomplished over and it diminishes even further when you realize the majority of African Americans have white DNA so y'all have 'Neanderthal' too :tedthinks:

Khmonymous
prince
prince
Posts: 7290
Joined: January 3rd, 2015, 6:26 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by Khmonymous » March 21st, 2017, 2:02 pm

The Chosen One wrote:[youtube]<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/75RJmy_h9yI?ecver=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/youtube]
[youtube]<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zKaBBB-3M7Y?ecver=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/youtube]
[youtube]<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lhbadzpzJPY?ecver=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/youtube]

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :chinamike: :chinamike: :chinamike: :chinamike:
Image

Don't play yo self
My problem is... I can't stop roastin Niggaz

Deezus
prince
prince
Posts: 7207
Joined: August 23rd, 2011, 10:49 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by Deezus » March 21st, 2017, 2:19 pm

How is this a bad thing? Mixed breeds are always genetically superior to pure breeds... In every species. Plus neanderthals were not sub-human. They were human. Just another species. They had bigger brains than homo sapiens, they are the ones who originally taught homosapiens how to create and use tools, are the first human species to produce and control fire, etc. Probably inbred with homosapiens knowing the mixed offspring would be somehow superior. Which is also probably why nobody with this "9% neanderthal" DNA is crying about curses and shit.

Khmonymous
prince
prince
Posts: 7290
Joined: January 3rd, 2015, 6:26 am

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by Khmonymous » March 21st, 2017, 2:27 pm

Deezus wrote:How is this a bad thing? Mixed breeds are always genetically superior to pure breeds... In every species. Plus neanderthals were not sub-human. They were human. Just another species. They had bigger brains than homo sapiens, they are the ones who originally taught homosapiens how to create and use tools, are the first human species to produce and control fire, etc. Probably inbred with homosapiens knowing the mixed offspring would be somehow superior. Which is also probably why nobody with this "9% neanderthal" DNA is crying about curses and shit.
Yea these faggots crying bout this shit for years now
My problem is... I can't stop roastin Niggaz

BluntedUp
ooog
ooog
Posts: 25135
Joined: May 10th, 2009, 8:03 pm

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by BluntedUp » March 21st, 2017, 3:18 pm

My mans chili shit on niel degrasse tyson for his work in astrophysics but wanna use white man science when he think it benefits him :wtf2: so called concious black people in this country more sleep them the people they attack :smh:
K-Boss wrote:
Deezus wrote:How is this a bad thing? Mixed breeds are always genetically superior to pure breeds... In every species. Plus neanderthals were not sub-human. They were human. Just another species. They had bigger brains than homo sapiens, they are the ones who originally taught homosapiens how to create and use tools, are the first human species to produce and control fire, etc. Probably inbred with homosapiens knowing the mixed offspring would be somehow superior. Which is also probably why nobody with this "9% neanderthal" DNA is crying about curses and shit.
Yea these faggots crying bout this shit for years now
But u still on a website geared towards blacks vying for their attention. Get yo ass on bruh. :lol:

BluntedUp
ooog
ooog
Posts: 25135
Joined: May 10th, 2009, 8:03 pm

Re: All non-Africans Are At Least 9% Neanderthal (a sub-human species)

Post by BluntedUp » March 21st, 2017, 3:40 pm

Deezus wrote:How is this a bad thing? Mixed breeds are always genetically superior to pure breeds... In every species. Plus neanderthals were not sub-human. They were human. Just another species. They had bigger brains than homo sapiens, they are the ones who originally taught homosapiens how to create and use tools, are the first human species to produce and control fire, etc. Probably inbred with homosapiens knowing the mixed offspring would be somehow superior. Which is also probably why nobody with this "9% neanderthal" DNA is crying about curses and shit.
https://youtu.be/hDWAt_QfMvA

Whites in a black country, young one claimin he a hebrew for the same reasons chili and other israelites call themselves it. :hmm: :umhm:

Post Reply