NEGRITOS OF S.E ASIA

[freddiefourfingers]

it does mean that there are older humans thats not in africa and before the so called migration and all humans are related just like all apes are so theres really no way u can find a human thats not related to any human at all but being related dont mean that they are the same just like how humans and apes are related but we arent the same...

-you may wanna reread it..

the article is saying that this information challenges the timeline..
but doesn't challenge evolution..
or migratory theory..

-and yes you're right. all humans are related. though it confuses me how you can accept that, but not accept human evolution. unless you're religious.

but yea, we definitely have our differences.
as in-- being more suspectible to this or that disease.
being unable to digest certain animal sugars.
different lung capacities.
and many other anatomical differences.



but these differences among humans are quite trivial, compared to the differences between humans and apes. and even THAT difference is only represented by what, 2 or 3 percent of our DNA??

[sonofmongol]

Early Modern Human Sites in the Levant and North Africa. Adapted from Asia map by Curtis3250692; data from Frumkin et al.in press and Gopher et al. 2010. But --the story is complicated, so I assembled some pages and a photo essay to go over the context for Qesem Cave, why the claims for EMH are so interesting, and to describe some of the evidence for EMH in the transition period between the Middle to Lower Paleolithic in the region of the Levant. I asked Ran Barkai, director of the Qesem Cave Project , about the dating of the cave: currently, the published dates are on speleotherms, which are natural cave deposits. He said that there is a paper in preparation describing dates on burnt flint and animal bone which support the speleotherm dates of 200,000-400,000 years old. I also asked him if there were plans to submit the teeth for DNA analysis, which might resolve the question of whether the teeth were Neanderthal or EMH: he was the opinion that the teeth were probably too old to have intact DNA, but he was planning to dis is from archeology. Com....dis doesn't dbunk n e thing I posted...australoid is an outdated term, but like I said earlier so is race n general...earlier u said u didn't bliebe n evolution da qesem project actually disproves ur theory...b4 50,000 yrs ago there was only different shades of black ppl ( brown watever U want call it there was no mongoloid or caucusoid 4 da lack of a better word around 400,000 yrs ago...n lastly qesem could've been an early failed migration by archaic humans..there is no evidence dat dey evocled n2 modern humans

wtf? map made by curtis325029? whos curtis? u getting ur info from blogs... u always copying and pasting from unreliable sites... and not giving me no links... i also asked u for some links before but u didnt give no links... u didnt answer some of my questions as well... so everything ur saying is invalid and void...

[sonofmongol]

i dont believe in evolution... its really not possible that all human life came from africa... theres a lot of theories that disagrees with africa theory... theres just too many factors too many difference in not just the phenotypes but genetics as well...

and lets say human life did start and came from east africa then how come there is no trace of fossils or any living people today there that resembles europeans or asians at all? all these years and still no evolution in any populations of east africa... but yet once they left they some how just evolved...

and btw both china and mid east are in asia...

and it was denisovans... which are the pre humans of east asia... as to neanderthals is to europe...

-well, if you don't believe in evolution then i guess thats pretty much gonna be the main obstacle preventing you from following through with whats being said.

funny you should quote nat geo, though. they're not hardly the source of anti-evolution info.

-and when i used the areas of asia, china and the mid east, i did so to geographic reasons. i was talkin bout behaviorally modern humans and their remaining artifacts. well its easier for anyone to look up, by specifying for example-- JAPAN or Taiwan!! Both in asia, right?? Rather than just say asia, i narrowed the geography down a lil. Dig?

well evolution has so many wrong things with it... and didnt evolution been debunked already... people says that darwins idea is a lie... a hoax... its been exposed... theres too many errors with it... theres so many sources saying that everytime u hear people saying this or that goes against darwins theory... remember its a theory... that was made up in the 1870s... which is a long time and technology wasnt advance yet... and it was also the time when the different races theory was created as well... eg mongoloid, negroid, caucasoid... and it was debunked and now its outdated... and so is the evolution theory...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvUEGHDHCfY heres the link to evolution being outdated...

[sonofmongol]

it does mean that there are older humans thats not in africa and before the so called migration and all humans are related just like all apes are so theres really no way u can find a human thats not related to any human at all but being related dont mean that they are the same just like how humans and apes are related but we arent the same...

-you may wanna reread it..

the article is saying that this information challenges the timeline..
but doesn't challenge evolution..
or migratory theory..

-and yes you're right. all humans are related. though it confuses me how you can accept that, but not accept human evolution. unless you're religious.

but yea, we definitely have our differences.
as in-- being more suspectible to this or that disease.
being unable to digest certain animal sugars.
different lung capacities.
and many other anatomical differences.



but these differences among humans are quite trivial, compared to the differences between humans and apes. and even THAT difference is only represented by what, 2 or 3 percent of our DNA??

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... z1SmuAiGkF heres the link to answer everything that u just said...

[sonofmongol]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGhXuMpw ... re=related heres the link to africa theory being debunked...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpoFmjgF ... re=related heres the link to darwins theory being debunked...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL1USVvPdow another link to the africa theory being debunked...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8makou3D ... re=related another link to the africa theory being debunked...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=No_Id8H4 ... re=related another link to the africa theory being debunked...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUZDTzrO ... ure=relmfu another link to the africa theory being debunked...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jh_8xiqr ... re=related another link to to the africa theory being debunked...

[brownbomber]

I don't kno how 2 post links on my phone I got dat from archeaology. com..da website is not unreliable..u have no scientific studies 2 prove ur point just u tube videos but my site is unreliable i can find a video on u tube of sum1 who found bigfoot...evolution hasn't been dbunked only da time line...lastly da word Negrito means lil black ppl so wit dat bn said dey r black...not african but black

[sonofmongol]

I don't kno how 2 post links on my phone I got dat from archeaology. com..da website is not unreliable..u have no scientific studies 2 prove ur point just u tube videos but my site is unreliable i can find a video on u tube of sum1 who found bigfoot...evolution hasn't been dbunked only da time line...lastly da word Negrito means lil black ppl so wit dat bn said dey r black...not african but black

so u saying u dont even own a computer?? how are u trying to debate on this when u dont even know how to posts links using ur phone??

actually u have no scientific studies to prove nothing all u did was copy and paste from sites which isnt no proof...

the videos i showed u is videos of REAL scientists talking about REAL studies done by them and of REAL documentaries... how are u going to compare bigfoot which is a cryptic... which isnt done by REAL scientists... which is ANOTHER subject its absurb how ur trying to compare "bigfoot" to REAL scientific studies... are u serious??? u obviously didnt even watch any of the videos... and ur still trying to argue...

wow... i feel like im debating with a little kid... u want to only hear one side of the story... which is the old and outdated theory that has been debunked... they are dark skin but not related to africans at all finally u realized it... like i said u still havent answered my other questions and u didnt even click my links which CLEARLY says DEBUNKING darwins theory...

[sonofmongol]

u are in denial...

[backintheday]

mitochondrial adam and eve who all humans on earth share the same dna with go back to north eastern africa... this don't mean that there wasn't humans before this, just that we don't have dna before it... Qusem cave is showing that they found homo sapiens that are between 200-400k years ago, going by both teeth and tools they say these bones do come from homo sapiens and not neanderthals or homo erectus... they don't have the dna results and don't know if they will be able to get them to test it they are related to mitochondrial adam and eve that we are aware of today, but common belief is that they will or would...

somewhere around 70-90k years ago a super volcano erupted in india, the fall out from this super volcano spread throughout the entire world affecting vegetation and animals, some scientist believe that over 90% of humans world wide died as a result and that most living humans migrated torwards the north eastern coast of africa where the volcano did not affect humans so much... it's after this volcanic eruption that humans started to progress much quicker than before and scientist believe that because different cultures migrated to the same areas and was able to share technology that this might have happened. It's also know that few people outside of the eastern african coast did survive as they have found tools and such both before and after the eruption by the same people.

everyone so concerned with who the original man was (homo sapiens)... chances are most likely that the missing link of homos sapiens may have started out throughout the entire world throughout a few hundred to a few thousand years seperatley from each other but so close in history that we would never know, the only true way to find out is to find the missing link itself.

[sonofmongol]

mitochondrial adam and eve who all humans on earth share the same dna with go back to north eastern africa... this don't mean that there wasn't humans before this, just that we don't have dna before it... Qusem cave is showing that they found homo sapiens that are between 200-400k years ago, going by both teeth and tools they say these bones do come from homo sapiens and not neanderthals or homo erectus... they don't have the dna results and don't know if they will be able to get them to test it they are related to mitochondrial adam and eve that we are aware of today, but common belief is that they will or would...

somewhere around 70-90k years ago a super volcano erupted in india, the fall out from this super volcano spread throughout the entire world affecting vegetation and animals, some scientist believe that over 90% of humans world wide died as a result and that most living humans migrated torwards the north eastern coast of africa where the volcano did not affect humans so much... it's after this volcanic eruption that humans started to progress much quicker than before and scientist believe that because different cultures migrated to the same areas and was able to share technology that this might have happened. It's also know that few people outside of the eastern african coast did survive as they have found tools and such both before and after the eruption by the same people.

everyone so concerned with who the original man was (homo sapiens)... chances are most likely that the missing link of homos sapiens may have started out throughout the entire world throughout a few hundred to a few thousand years seperatley from each other but so close in history that we would never know, the only true way to find out is to find the missing link itself.

everybody have dna that traces back to one place not just africa... life started in multiple places on earth... and the missing link has been found already... its a lemur named "ida" heres the link http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... found.html

[brownbomber]

wat does dis have 2 do wit adam or eve..u post a lot of links dat has nutn 2 do wit ats bn discussed...@ 1st u didn't blieve n evolution then u posted da out of middle east link now u sayn humans all come from different places yet dna shows dat we r connected..n u blieve dna about da negritos bn closely related 2 other south eeast asians, but u don't blieve da dna from da australoids dat proves dat dey migrated outta africa...I post a story about da negritos off u tube n I get called an afrocentrist when I have more evidence supportn my theory than u do!

[backintheday]

mitochondrial adam and eve are the two people man and woman that the whole worlds population can go back to by dna evidence... mitochondrial adam and eve can change at any time depending on findings and the ability to find DNA.

mitochondrial adam and eve that we have proven thus far is no doubt from the north eastern coast of africa, though I believe the two mitochondrials lived thousands of years apart, but thats a whole new level... now if they get everything they could want in quesem then mitochondrial adam and eve could change.

my personal belief after listening unendingly to my mans who has a masters degree in anthropology and is working on his doctorette is stated above... that homo sapiens developed around habitable areas around the world in a historically small time frame and that no race nor no skin color can claim originall man... though that our present humanology can be directly traced to the north eastern coast of africa and possibly in the future to Israel.

[backintheday]

by missing link I mean the arrival of homo-sapiens, which so far science says are not genetically related to other neanderthals or homo erectus.

[sonofmongol]

:facepalm: wat does dis have 2 do wit adam or eve..u post a lot of links dat has nutn 2 do wit ats bn discussed...@ 1st u didn't blieve n evolution then u posted da out of middle east link now u sayn humans all come from different places yet dna shows dat we r connected..n u blieve dna about da negritos bn closely related 2 other south eeast asians, but u don't blieve da dna from da australoids dat proves dat dey migrated outta africa...I post a story about da negritos off u tube n I get called an afrocentrist when I have more evidence supportn my theory than u do!

wtf are u talking about i always said that evolution is false... out of the middle east as in NOT from africa... its still another part of the world... DNA shows we are connected to plants too so does that mean we are plants???

i believe it cause its obvious they freaking live in southeast asia... wtf do u expect?? this is common sense here... and when did i say that i dont believe the dna? dont put words in my mouth... i said that they didnt come from africa... not about DNA... holy shit do u know how to read?? all humans are related... but none of them come from africa besides africans...

the story u posted is the same from wiki... and u have more evidence than me?? u must be either trolling or ur dumb as hell... cause i posted more HARD evidence with multiple links to back up my shit all u did was copy and paste DEBUNKED THEORIES from wiki...

[sonofmongol]

by missing link I mean the arrival of homo-sapiens, which so far science says are not genetically related to other neanderthals or homo erectus.

i think hes trolling or hes simply just retarded... hes the same person that posted the link of columbus being black... and really believed it...

[brownbomber]

@back n da day...I was talkn 2 da mongol...he posted a link about da lemur like dat hdd sumthin 2 do wit wat u said about adam n eve,n it didnt

[sonofmongol]

@back n da day...I was talkn 2 da mongol...he posted a link about da lemur like dat hdd sumthin 2 do wit wat u said about adam n eve,n it didnt

wow... u are really dumb... u dont even read no posts at all... at the end of his damn post he talked about missing links moron and the lemurs are the missing links holy shit damn ur dumb as fuck

[brownbomber]

But u don't blieve n evolution u a clown ...like I said dat article had nutn 2 do wit da adam n eve back n da day was talkn about

[sonofmongol]

But u don't blieve n evolution u a clown ...like I said dat article had nutn 2 do wit da adam n eve back n da day was talkn about

wtf you a dumbfuck... nobody believes in evolution no more but u outdated dumbfucks that still use those mongoloid race terms... the fucking article talked about the missing link of humans and at the end of his fucking post so i decided to add my shit to his missing link question u dumbfuck i wasnt trying to answer adam and eve... damn... why are u so slow??

[sonofmongol]

i cant believe that iv been arguing with a person who thought columbus was black... and who still uses outdated terms... who dont own a computer and dont know how to use their phones to post links...

[brownbomber]

U can't dbunk nutn I posted n dis thread..so now dat u got ur nsults out da way can we get back 2 dicussn da Negritos...its more evidence supportn an out of africa theory then ur multiple population theory...its more evidence supportn evolution then not

[sonofmongol]

U can't dbunk nutn I posted n dis thread..so now dat u got ur nsults out da way can we get back 2 dicussn da Negritos...its more evidence supportn an out of africa theory then ur multiple population theory...its more evidence supportn evolution then not

nice try troll but u cant debunk nothing... since all ur saying is made up u still havent post no real evidence... u almost had me tho... but i finally realized that ur a troll so and

[brownbomber]

Outta africa is widely xcepted n so is evolution...nice try on wat da name of dis thread is da negritos of s.e asia their negritos n dey live n s.e asia...there is dna evidence dat sho da ausyraoids 4 lack of a better wordZ( I already told u race n general is outdated 2-3 times n dis thread)migrated from africa.. da negrito skin is black like mine, he is not african tho u can't dbunk nutn I said...like I said earlier black is a skin color not race

[freddiefourfingers]

@sonofmongol

-i really ain't too interested in ya plethora of fringe sources for anti evolution propoganda. I've been in touch with biological sciences since '01/'02. soo-- hey.

and honestly, I think you're "playing dumb" on the issue, just for argument's sake.

evolution ain't never been proven wrong. examples of evolution have been challenged. yes. but beyond that, naa dun. u know better than that.

[HoodBeenUp]

Why you arguing with these lames....they believe anything the television set tells them. They don't know how to discern information. They don't even know what discern means until they look it up and then reply. Niggas in here think hispanic is a race....

[sonofmongol]

Outta africa is widely xcepted n so is evolution...nice try on wat da name of dis thread is da negritos of s.e asia their negritos n dey live n s.e asia...there is dna evidence dat sho da ausyraoids 4 lack of a better wordZ( I already told u race n general is outdated 2-3 times n dis thread)migrated from africa.. da negrito skin is black like mine, he is not african tho u can't dbunk nutn I said...like I said earlier black is a skin color not race

widely accepted...? show me proof of it or it dont exist just like most of the things u said here with no proof just all shit u made up... wheres the dna evidence show me proof... hurry up show the proof... nice try with the migration theory its a fucking theory... u cant debunk nothing i said... so nice try kid... negritos have very small penises... and they are midgets... so that means their so called ancestors as u said were from east africa must have very small penises as well... nice try troll... im not taking nothing that u say serious anymore... im done here troll...

[sonofmongol]

@sonofmongol

-i really ain't too interested in ya plethora of fringe sources for anti evolution propoganda. I've been in touch with biological sciences since '01/'02. soo-- hey.

and honestly, I think you're "playing dumb" on the issue, just for argument's sake.

evolution ain't never been proven wrong. examples of evolution have been challenged. yes. but beyond that, naa dun. u know better than that.

first off evolution is a THEORY NOT a FACT stop acting like its a hard fact with concrete evidence... its being challenged cause theres so many wrong things with it... and so many things that are left unexplained... just cause darwin was the first to think of evolution u think its true... it was thought of in the 1870s... we are more advanced now... we know more than what we did before... and theres so many sources debunking evolution and its NEW and MODERN ideas and evidence debunking a OLD OUTDATED theory...

[sonofmongol]

Why you arguing with these lames....they believe anything the television set tells them. They don't know how to discern information. They don't even know what discern means until they look it up and then reply. Niggas in here think hispanic is a race....

u right idk why im even arguing with these ignorant morons... u can already tell that they aint they bright at all...

[brownbomber]

@ mongol ...y u worried about da size of another mans dick ...I'm dun go n back n 4 th wit u ...1st u don't blieve n evolution then u post a link about da missn link. U said u don't blieve n da migration theory then u post da out of middle east link...like I said u can't dbunk I nutn I said n ima leave it @ dat.

[ImGangsta]

NEGRITOS ARE BLACK

[sonofmongol]

@ mongol ...y u worried about da size of another mans dick ...I'm dun go n back n 4 th wit u ...1st u don't blieve n evolution then u post a link about da missn link. U said u don't blieve n da migration theory then u post da out of middle east link...like I said u can't dbunk I nutn I said n ima leave it @ dat.

yo dumbfuck im done with u... i posted the missing link to the other kid NOT u moron... worry about ur own shit why u butting into another mans convo for??? and he thought the missing link theory havent been discussed yet so i sent him a link... and the fucking out of middle east is to go against ur african theory... but in all i dont believe not of that out of shit theory even tho middle east is more believable and credible with more hard evidence... but all human life start in different parts of the world... so like i said u cant debunk shit at all... so ima leave it at that... DONT EVEN TRY TO REPLY BACK TO ME AGAIN END THREAD...

[freddiefourfingers]

@son of mongol

you don't make no fuckin sense, dude..

you come across as being informed at least as to how you refute everything you read on this topic, but then you go on to push the fringe academic opinion on evolution's so called failure and antagonize the fact vs theory confusion.

but... you follow the multiple origin theory on human evolution, huh?
multiple origins.. which is not only itself a 'theory' (in terms of usage),
but still falls within the scope of human evolution nonetheless.

you a funny guy..
another troll character..

you got all these nat geo links, but i guess you just ignore the ones on evolution huh?
flux outta here..

[freddiefourfingers]

heyyy..

you wouldn't happen to know about a guy named Loring Brace, would ya??

[brownbomber]

Bump